Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology ; (12): 768-771, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-610386

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the effects of different volumes of ropivacaine with the same solubility in supraclavicular brachial plexus block(SCBPB) under ultrasound guidance on ipsilateral diaphragmaticparalysis.Methods Seventy two patients (32 males,40 females, aged 18-65 years, of ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for the right upper limb fracture internal fixation removal were randomized into group A (0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml) and group B (0.375% ropivacaine 30 ml), 36 cases in each group.The onset and duration of sensory and motor block were observed as well as complication.Diaphragmatic excursion were evaluated by M type ultrasound before and 30 min after drug injection under eupnea and forced respiration through observing diaphragmatic excursion to study diaphragmatic paralysis.Results The onset time of sensory block and maintaining time of sensory block or motor block had no significant difference between the two groups.Compared with group A,the onset time of motor block in group B was significantly shorter (P<0.05).Twelve cases (33.3%) in group A and 22 cases (61.1%) in group B respectively showed complete or partial hemidiaphragmatic paralysis 30 min after drug injection.Compared with group A, the rate of diaphragmatic paralysis in group B was significantly higher (P<0.05).Conclusion Supraclavicular brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance with 0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml or 30 ml both can provide excellent anesthetic effect.0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml is less likely to lead to diaphragmatic paralysis.

2.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1081-1084, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-616104

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the clinical value of homemade uniform drainage system and application results in continuous lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid. Methods A total of 75 patients underwent continuous lumbar cistern drainage of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with mechanical sampling were randomly divided into two groups, the control group (35 cases) using the traditional methods of continuous lumbar cistern drainage, the test group (40 cases) with self-designed uniform drainage device, compared with two groups of 24 hours from fluid volume flow control and the incidence of adverse reactions and the workload of nurses. Results The drainage rate equilibrium, the frequency of inspections and time respectively and the incidence of adverse reaction were (1.07 ± 0.35)/h, (23.67 ± 7.23) min/d and 5.00%(2/40) in the test group, less than that in the control group (2.14 ± 0.83)/h, (48.54 ± 11.69) min/d and 25.71%(9/35), there were significant differences (t=8.547, 7.641, χ2=16.347, all P <0.05). Conclusions In order to control the workload of nurses and reduce the incidence rate of adverse reactions, it is worth to promote the application of the continuous lumbar cistern drainage.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL